The UK's decision to choose the F-35B variant of the Lightning II may have saddled the military with a more expensive, less effective platform.
The British government’s decision to re-adopt the short take-off, vertical landing variant of the F-35 Lightning II (the F-35B) was justified on the basis that it would provide sufficient capability and a through-life cost saving over the other variants. Fresh analysis of the evidence reveals that, in fact, the adoption of the F-35B carries with it significant risks of increased lifetime costs, decreased capability, operational difficulties and, in the long term, saddling the
Continue reading by joining RUSIView membership options
Join the World’s Leading Defence and Security Community
- A busy programme of members' only events
- Access to a suite of RUSI publications
- Access to experts, networks and research teams