You are here
Discussions regarding the military utility of aircraft carriers have, in recent years, had an unfortunate tendency to veer between complacent and apocalyptic. To its detractors, the aircraft carrier is little more than a white elephant comparable to the battleship in its day. Moreover, improving ISR systems are enabling peer competitors to track and target manoeuvring assets at sea.
However, important caveats often go unstated. The ISR assets, kill chains and strike assets available to different competitors – and the weight they place on anti-carrier operations – differ significantly. Assessing the vulnerability of UK carriers to Russian A2/AD systems on the basis of Chinese A2/AD capabilities in the Pacific overlooks notable Russian deficiencies in terms of ISR and the number of available launch platforms. Additionally, there has been little rigorous examination in open source literature of precisely how vulnerable carriers are to different strike assets. The rough and illustrative results that this first cut at modelling produces highlights some of the vulnerabilities of UK carriers and the avenues by which they may retain their utility.
Become A Member
To access the full text of this article and many other benefits, become a RUSI member.