RUSI JournalVOLUME 170ISSUE 2

Meritocracy and the Military: Lessons from the Royal Air Force

The pursuit of a fair and equitable system might be a better stated aim than an assumption that it already exists. Generated by AI. Courtesy of Adobe Firefly

The pursuit of a fair and equitable system might be a better stated aim than an assumption that it already exists. Generated by AI. Courtesy of Adobe Firefly


Using ‘meritocracy’ as a short-hand for a fair and merit-based system risks obscuring that it remains a important goal rather than the status quo.

This essay challenges the casual use of the term ‘meritocracy’ by senior military officers and the implications of using that rhetoric, which imparts a simplicity to the concept. Sophy Antrobus analyses the RAF, given its historic promotion of itself as a service which attempted to–and did–improve the social mobility of boys from modest backgrounds to the highest levels of the RAF through its apprentice scheme established in the 1920s. She argues that the term should be approached with caution by senior military leaders and perhaps replaced with simpler, less controversial language. Perhaps the pursuit of a fair and equitable system might be a better stated aim than an assumption that it already exists.

unlockedThis content is available to you

Read the full text on Taylor & Francis

This link will open in a new window


Taylor and Francis publishes the RUSI Journal and Whitehall Papers on behalf of RUSI


WRITTEN BY

Sophy Antrobus

View profile


Footnotes


Explore our related content