RUSI JournalVOLUME 169ISSUE 1/2

Comparing Historic Military Capabilities: Apples with Apples

Journalists watch the Vickers and Bren MGs being fired on a range in Western Command during training in 1941. Courtesy of Vickers MG Collection & Research Association/Crown Copyright

Journalists watch the Vickers and Bren MGs being fired on a range in Western Command during training in 1941. Courtesy of Vickers MG Collection & Research Association/Crown Copyright


When assessing historical military capabilities, analysis should go beyond the technical aspects to identify other critical factors.

Using comparative historical analysis to compare and contrast historic military capabilities is possible using the Defence Lines of Development as a model. Richard Fisher demonstrates how it is not appropriate to merely compare technical aspects of equipment, but that it is necessary to also consider the training, personnel, information, doctrine and concepts, organisation, infrastructure and logistics as part of a comprehensive comparison. Equipment comparisons exist but are flawed as they may not identify the critical factors that enhance or diminish the overall capability. The method is evaluated using the infantry section’s machine guns of the Second World War: the Bren and MG42.

unlockedThis content is available to you

Read the full text on Taylor & Francis

This link will open in a new window


Taylor and Francis publishes the RUSI Journal and Whitehall Papers on behalf of RUSI


WRITTEN BY

Richard Fisher

View profile


Footnotes


Explore our related content