Defence Skills: A Shift in the Myth

pdf
Read Full Report(PDF 301KB)

Policy-makers assume defence skills are in assured supply. New research suggests this may not be the case

UK policy-makers take comfort, perhaps erroneously, in the narrative that defence-industrial competencies remain alive and available to state decision-makers – essentially frozen into some form of perpetual equilibrium of assured supply.

It is often assumed that skills in a given defence-industrial base somehow self-regulate through the hidden hand of the market. This means that, when one company within the defence ecosystem makes redundancies – for example, to relieve perceived over-capacity – another defence business will absorb these skills.

This briefing explores what happens to the wider economy and to defence competencies when people leave defence businesses – either voluntarily or as part of a deliberate redundancy scheme. The paper also tests the premise that the defence market self-regulates in the maintenance of a country’s defence skills base.

About the Authors

Professor John Louth is a Senior Research Fellow and Director of Defence, Industries and Society at RUSI. He teaches at the University of Roehampton Business School.

Professor Trevor Taylor is a Professorial Research Fellow at RUSI. He teaches at Cranfield University.

Dr Henrik Heidenkamp is a Research Fellow for RUSI’s Defence, Industries and Society Programme (DISP) and a mentor for the RUSI/University of Roehampton Business School PhD Programme.


WRITTEN BY

Trevor Taylor

Professorial Research Fellow

Defence, Industries and Society

View profile

Henrik Heidenkamp

Associate Fellow; Research Analyst, JALLC

View profile


Footnotes


Explore our related content