Prevention Project
A comprehensive research programme on the effectiveness of preventing and countering violent extremism (P/CVE) projects.
RUSI’s Terrorism and Conflict group conducted an extensive, multi-year research project to collate, assess and strengthen the existing knowledge base for P/CVE interventions across different thematic and geographic areas. The Prevention Project aims to analyse the effectiveness of global P/CVE interventions by looking at ‘what can work and what has not worked’.
Project sponsor
The Norwegian Government
Project team
Emily Winterbotham
Director of Terrorism and Conflict Studies
Terrorism and Conflict
Michael Jones
Research Fellow
Terrorism and Conflict
Dr Jessica White
Acting Director of Terrorism and Conflict Studies
Terrorism and Conflict
Claudia Wallner
Research Fellow
Chris Goodenough
Programme Manager
Terrorism and Conflict
Key findings
The Prevention Project was a detailed analysis of the evidence base and mapped over 1,500 projects implemented by around 900 organisations in 100 countries, spanning a wide variety of themes within the research space.
The research for this project found that the evidence base for programme efficacy remains limited, with little information sharing, weak monitoring and evaluation regimes, a reliance on the same relatively small cluster of case studies, and a general lack of longitudinal analysis hampering collective understandings of P/CVE outcomes.
We outline the cross-cutting findings and recommendations below, highlighting key lessons and themes reflected in both the available literature and data collected from the research team’s fieldwork in Kenya and Lebanon. Key findings include:
- Securitising other types of intervention, such as development programming, by conflating them with P/CVE could undermine their purpose while failing to achieve P/CVE objectives.
- Integrated interventions can help mitigate harmful outcomes and increase the efficacy of P/CVE programmes.
- Identifying intervention target groups should be guided by evidence-based risk and protective factors rather than assumptions when designing programmes.
- Those in the wider social environments of ‘at-risk’ individuals are often well placed to identify signs of radicalisation and warning behaviours, but it should not be assumed that they are always able to spot or will report such concerns.
- Relatability and access to target populations should guide decisions on who to involve and support in P/CVE programme implementation.
- The process of engaging in P/CVE interventions and the trust built between intervention providers and participants play an important role in the impact an intervention can have on participants.
Project outputs
Overview outputs from the Prevention Project
Gender
Youth & Education
Mentorship
Communications
Project impact
The Prevention Project has contributed significantly to the development of global best practices for P/CVE programming. The results of this project have been shared at multiple levels, including at international forums such as the United Nations Counter Terrorism Week events and the Eradicate Hate Global Summit, as well as with multiple regional and national level policy and practitioner audiences.
This project also helps to inform and engage knowledge-sharing across the P/CVE practitioner community as they continue to design and implement new programmes in the transnational security space.