You are here

The sanctions regime specified exemptions for existing contracts with the Iranian financial sector.

UN Financial Sanctions on Iran: An Example of How Asset Freeze Exemptions Worked in Practice

Jonathan Brewer
RUSI Journal, 29 September 2016
Iran's Nuclear Programme, Iran
The impact of asset freezes on one Iranian financial institution suggests that the UN sanctions worked as intended.

Asset freeze requirements are central to most UN Security Council sanctions regimes. In order to ensure proportionality and minimise unintended consequences, certain exemptions are built into the requirements of each regime. In the case of UN sanctions on Iran, the exemptions extended to assets connected with contracts in place before sanctions were imposed. While UN sanctions on Iran were in place, an Iranian financial entity (IFE), otherwise subject to the asset freeze, made payments over several years under such a contract. Payments were received largely on schedule except for a period of about thirteen to fourteen months after the IFE was excluded from the SWIFT (Society for Worldwide Interbank Financial Telecommunication) system. Jonathan Brewer shows how UN asset freeze exemptions worked as intended in this case.

Continue Reading

Become A Member

To access the full text of this article and many other benefits, become a RUSI member.

Author

Dr Jonathan Brewer
Associate Fellow

Dr Jonathan Brewer is a visiting Professor at King's College, London, carrying out research with the Alpha Project on proliferation and... read more

Support Rusi Research

Subscribe to our Newsletter