<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1"?>
<?xml-stylesheet title="XSL_formatting" type="text/xsl" href="/template/rss.xsl"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>RUSI Commentary Feed</title>
<link>http://rusi.org/</link>
<description></description>
<managingEditor>web@rusi.org</managingEditor>
<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2008</copyright>
<item>
<title>The Battle of Britain: The Land Perspective</title>
<link>http://rusi.org/research/militarysciences/history/commentary/rss/ref:C4538E2591AE95/ </link>
<description></description>
<date>October 2006</date>
</item>
<item>
<title>The Battle of Britain: The Air Perspective</title>
<link>http://rusi.org/research/militarysciences/history/commentary/rss/ref:C4538E034F182D/ </link>
<description></description>
<date>October 2006</date>
</item>
<item>
<title>The Battle of Britain Debate</title>
<link>http://rusi.org/research/militarysciences/history/commentary/rss/ref:C4538D604EF124/ </link>
<description>Christina Goulter, Andrew Gordon and Gary Sheffield</description>
<date>October 2006</date>
</item>
<item>
<title>Battle of Britain: The Naval Perspective</title>
<link>http://rusi.org/research/militarysciences/history/commentary/rss/ref:C4538DAE3AB61C/ </link>
<description></description>
<date>October 2006</date>
</item>
<item>
<title>A History of the Royal United Services Institute</title>
<link>http://rusi.org/research/militarysciences/history/commentary/rss/ref:A4354D757E280F/ </link>
<description>The origin of our Institute, today deeply concerned with the problems of national and international security lies, paradoxically, in an era when Britain had emerged safely and victoriously from the ordeal of a long war when there was every hope for a long peace. The armed forces of the Crown have never stood higher in the public regard than they did fourteen years after the Battle of Waterloo. </description>
<date>October 2005</date>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
