Contacts

Aggression and Politics: Can the ICC Stay on Course?

By Lindsay O'Sullivan
19 Jul 2010

The ICC has jurisdiction over genocide, crimes against humanity, war crimes and aggression. Defining the latter has been notoriously elusive, and states have debated the ability of the Court to try these kinds of cases. With 111 signatories, the ICC nevertheless continues to walk the political tightrope between neutrality and effectiveness.

Continue reading

Login

If you are a member or registered user, please login and access this and other articles

Login

Become a Member

To access this article, become a member of RUSI and benefit from a wide range of other membership benefits
Register
 




RUSI Under 35's Forum
RUSI crest 2
Network for the next generation of policy-makers and thought leaders.
RUSI Library of Military History
Library Home Card
A unique collection of national historical and cultural importance.
New Benefits
Membership badge
A greater range of membership packages announced
Follow RUSI.org
Follow RUSI
Follow RUSI through Twitter, Facebook and RSS feeds