Why NATO Should Return Home: The Case for a Twenty-First Century Alliance
Aug 2008, Vol. 153, No. 4
By Christopher Coker
In the 1990s the transatlantic alliance fell victim to two moments of hubris. The first was the American unipolar moment which followed the end of the Cold War. ‘Multilateral if possible, unilateral if necessary’ was Madeleine Albright’s motto. The second moment was a severe bout of what we nowadays call ‘European cosmopolitanism’ which was accompanied by the enlargement of the European Union itself.
Add your comments
By Christopher Coker
In the 1990s the transatlantic alliance fell victim to two moments of hubris. The first was the American unipolar moment which followed the end of the Cold War. ‘Multilateral if possible, unilateral if necessary’ was Madeleine Albright’s motto. The second moment was a severe bout of what we nowadays call ‘European cosmopolitanism’ which was accompanied by the enlargement of the European Union itself.
You need 4 credits to access this item
If you are a member or registered user, please login
Not already a member and have not yet registered?
Add your comments
Copyright © 2008 RUSI